YDC abuse is decades old, as is state cover-up, master lawsuit alleges

Sign Up For Our FREE Daily eNews!

Entrance to the Youth Substance Use Disorder Treatment Center, added to the YDC building in 2018. According to a Sept. 2021 report the state spends about $13 million a year to run the Manchester center to serve children ages 13 to 17 who’ve been ordered to a secure institutional setting by the juvenile justice system.  While the facility has 144 beds, it has been averaging about nine children a day, according to the most recent report from a consultant hired to recommend steps for closing the center and transitioning youth to a more appropriate setting. File Photo/Carol Robidoux

CONCORD, NH — Merrimack Superior Court Judge Andrew Schulman last Thursday approved the consolidation of 640-plus civil cases filed by individuals who, as children, were court-ordered to state-run and private contracted juvenile facilities where they allege they suffered physical, sexual and emotional abuse by employees.

The next day, lead attorneys Cyrus F. Rilee and David A. Vicinanzo filed a 50-page “Master Complaint” detailing the state’s history of detaining children dating back to the mid-19th century, the abuse children suffered while in state custody and alleged cover-up for decades by state officials.

Schulman’s order lifted the stay that was in place while both parties tried to reach a settlement.

Legislators approved a $100 million settlement but attorneys for the plaintiffs say the offer is inadequate and that they intend to proceed to trial with the majority of the cases.

Most of the abuse allegations involve the former Youth Development Center in Manchester, now known as The John H. Sununu Youth Services Center, named for Gov. Chris Sununu’s father.

With the court ruling and the filing of the master lawsuit, Vicinanzo said the cases now move to the discovery face.  Schulman, in his order, said the state’s initial discovery package in the consolidated cases will amount to more than three million pages.

“Judge Schulman did what we had requested – consolidate all YDC and state youth facility cases and include all ancillary state contractor cases. And he’s directing the state to commence discovery immediately, and motions to start in 60 days. We will have monthly status conferences and after a few months of discovery and other education, we will work with the court to develop a consolidation plan for joint trials,” Vicinanzo said.

According to the lawsuit, since at least 1858, the State of New Hampshire has operated residential facilities to shelter, care for, protect, educate, and rehabilitate at-risk children.

The main facility in Manchester and its several adjunct facilities in Manchester and Concord over the years went by many names: the State Industrial School, the Adolescent Detention Center, the Youth Development Center, the Anna Philbrook Center, the Tobey School, the Sununu Youth Services Center, and the Youth Detention Services Unit.  The lawsuit refers to them all as “State Youth Facility (SYF).”

SYF also served at times as an orphanage, providing a refuge for abused, abandoned, and homeless children.

“But its founding promise was often forgotten as tales of horrific abuse have been publicly documented going as far back as 1930, when then-Governor Charles W. Tobey publicly admonished the State Industrial School’s board of trustees for presiding over an institution where “punitive methods savored of barbarism and the dark ages.”

 Examples of the abuse reported by Tobey included:

  • Girls being whipped “on their naked flesh by application of lashes from a piece of rubber piping with a wooden handle on one end, to the extent of from 100 to 250 strokes.”
  • The “water cure,” which was a form of waterboarding, where girls stripped to their underwear were blasted by cold water from a hose, including by
  • “play[ing] it in the girl’s face to ‘sort of strangle them.’”
  • Confining girls for periods as long as two weeks in six-by-eight foot “dungeons” that were pitch black dark inside, and whose only furniture consisted of a blanket and a pail in a corner.

Despite Governor Tobey’s admonitions, child abuse and generally deplorable conditions would continue to plague the State Youth Facility for decades to come, according to the lawsuit.

A photo of an individual “pod” with a bed and desk, for each youth seen as part of tour when the Sununu Youth Substance Use Disorder wing opened in 2018. File Photo/Carol Robidoux

While most SYF abuse and neglect “was actively concealed by the perpetrators and their co-conspirators, the violence, abuse, and neglect simmered just beneath the surface, with clues as to the true nature of the SYF bubbling up to the light of day from time to time. Sadly, those holding positions of authority within the state government—those with the power to institute badly needed reforms to the institution—consistently turned their backs on the children, downplaying or ignoring reports of abuse and neglect to protect the “bad actors,”’ the lawsuit says.

At times, even the State Supreme Court displayed shocking unconcern for the rights and well-being of child residents of state youth facilities, repeatedly referring to them as “problem children.” 

The lawsuit singles out former U.S. congressman and State Supreme Justice Charles Douglas III who this year wrote an op-ed, published in several newspapers statewide,  saying the $100 million fund would work for many victims.

The lawsuit cites the case of John M., where Douglas, writing for the majority, approved placing abused and neglected children together with those adjudicated of criminal activity, despite compelling expert opinion disfavoring such practices as detrimental to the best interests of children. The decision was premised on the desire to house the state’s inconvenient “problem children” as cheaply as possible.

 The John M. decision, the lawsuit contends, is philosophically aligned with Douglas’s prior decision in Jane Doe, 118 N.H. 422 (1978). In that case, a 13-year-old girl was impregnated. When the girl declined to identify the father, the lower court held her in contempt and locked her up at YDC. Douglas, again writing the opinion for the Court, concluded there was no reason to treat a pregnant 13-year-old victim of rape differently from an adult for contempt purposes, and accordingly approved her indefinite detention.

From the 1980s into the early 2000s, complaints frequently arose concerning appalling conditions at the state-run facilities, but most of the serious child abuse was concealed from public view.     

In 1980, for instance, then-Attorney General Thomas Rath told the Associated Press that “[t]here is no question that the potential exists for the YDC (Youth Development Center) to be the next Laconia [State School] in terms of litigation[,]” referring to the appalling neglect and abuse of mentally challenged persons (many of whom were children) at Laconia State School in the 1970s and early 80s.

A threatened federal probe and civil lawsuits concerning YDC never materialized. Yet reports of abuse and substandard conditions at the detention center persisted, including, for example, placing a resident “in leather restraints on a jail bed; crowd[ing] troubled teen-agers nearly shoulder to shoulder in a locked bedroom; us[ing] a substandard dormitory that in summer often smells of sewage and in winter leaves a sleeping boy shivering,”  according to a Dec. 6, 1987 article by Bob Hohler in the Boston Globe.

The New Hampshire Division of Children, Youth and Families opened an investigation into the facility following stories by Hohler and other journalists.

After the investigation was announced, State Representative L. Randy Lyman, vice-chair of the House committee overseeing children and family law, reported receiving 15 to 20 complaints that she deemed “extremely serious,” and that the complaints allege “an extensive pattern of abuse, physical and mental” including an allegation that “a boy with his head wrapped in a towel had his head banged on a pool table by staff[,]” an allegation that another “boy lost the tip of his finger when staff slammed it in a door[,]” and a number of complaints of verbal abuse and of “youths being locked in their rooms for small infractions for weeks and even months at a time”). DCYF, however, downplayed the results of its investigation, did not publish its investigation report publicly, and refused to discuss details of its findings, the lawsuit says. Nevertheless, its director, Nancy Rollins, reported that the investigation at a minimum confirmed that five residents at the juvenile facility were abused by staff.

Another example of a failure to correct occurred around the same time as DCYF’s SYF investigation, when one of YDC’s counselors was prosecuted for criminal sexual misconduct.

Wesley Oates was accused of engaging in sexual misconduct with an adult female victim. The allegation was deemed credible by police, resulted in a temporary order of protection issued against Oates, and was later reported to the YDC administration in 1999. Despite a misdemeanor conviction arising from the criminal conduct, which was reported to a supervisor at YDC in 2000, YDC continued to employ Oates for another 20 years, during which he committed multiple acts of physical, sexual, and emotional violence against numerous child victims at the YDC and the YDSU, the lawsuit alleges.

State lawmakers and juvenile advocates have long wanted to close the center, believing a youth detention facility is the wrong place to hold and rehabilitate children. File Photo/Dave Cummings, New Hampshire Bulletin

The lawsuit said those seeking damages suffered at least one form of abuse, but in most cases more than one including:

  • Physical violence, punching, slapping, kicking, striking with elbows, striking with knees, choking with hands or forearm, body slamming against hard surfaces beating victims in restraints, pushing victims downstairs, wrestling or martial arts moves on victims involving forcefully bending and twisting limbs into painful positions (for example, sleeper holds, arm bars, and other Jiu-Jitsu maneuvers) and exploiting pressure points, intentionally slamming doors on fingers, forcing victims to kneel on rice, forcing or coercing victims to fight one another, depriving injured victims of medical care;
  • Sexual abuse: indecent exposure, groping genitalia and other body parts and similar unwanted touching of a sexual nature, digital penetration of the vagina and the anus, penile penetration of the vagina and the anus, forced or coerced masturbation of the victim and/or of the perpetrator, forced or coerced oral sex of the victim and/or of the perpetrator, unjustified strip searches for the purposes of humiliation or sexual gratification, unjustified cavity searches for the purposes of humiliation or sexual gratification, unjustified invasion of privacy, including watching the victim while naked in the shower, depriving victims of clothing, and acts of voyeurism (for example, masturbating while watching the victim);
  • Various forms of mental or emotional abuse: constantly referring to targeted victims by the use of demeaning and dehumanizing terms (for example, calling targets “worthless,” “losers,” “pieces of shit,” “dogs,” “animals,” “scum”), making racist, sexist, or bigoted remarks (for example, using various racist slurs, calling females “whore,” “slut,” or “bitch,” calling males suspected of being gay “faggot”), intentionally preying on especially vulnerable children (for example, encouraging a suicidal youth to “go for it” or “just do it”), threatening physical violence or sexual abuse, plying children with illegal drugs, forcing or coercing victims to consume urine or garbage, grooming victims by befriending them or providing privileges, only to later betray the victim’s trust through acts of sexual abuse or physical violence, “gaslighting” victims by denying abuse had ever occurred or blaming the victim for the abuse, encouraging, forcing, or coercing child victims to do harm to other children or even to other adult staff members;
  • Use of excessive restraints and excessive confinement:  for consecutive days, weeks, or even months of solitary confinement or isolation in unsanitary or in unnecessarily harsh conditions (for example, depriving victims of bathroom access, bedding, and/or clothing);

 One example cited in the lawsuit concerning a cover-up of abuse at the Manchester juvenile detention center is one from 2017 when a child reported to a student intern that he had been sexually abused by a counselor, Kirstie Bean. The intern recorded the abuse disclosure in handwritten notes and, as per (often-ignored) policy, in the official central database for the SYSC. The intern reported the disclosure to her supervisor, who in turn reported it to his supervisors. Shortly afterward, the supervisor directed the intern to destroy her handwritten notes. The supervisor then accessed the database and deleted all references to the sexual abuse disclosure.  

Because the report of the abuse was deleted from its database, the official report of the SYSC to the federal DOJ for 2017 (filed in 2018) did not disclose the incident, violating not only state records law, but also committing a federal false statement felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

This criminal scheme only came to light because the intern disregarded her SYSC supervisor and brought her concerns to the state police and to the press.  

Bean in 2018 was convicted of sexual assault in connection with previously reported sexual assaults at YDC and is now a registered sex offender.


  Below: Sept. 2021 NH DHHS Work Group Report on Future of Sununu Youth Services Center

About this Author

pat-grossmith

Pat Grossmith

Pat Grossmith is a freelance reporter.