Aldermen approve tax credits for upcoming housing development

Sign Up For Our FREE Daily eNews!

 

Screenshot 2022 02 14 160126
A rendering of what the apartment building would look like according to the developers (in the left and center of the picture), transposed on a picture looking northwest from Elm Street onto West Auburn Street across the Market Basket parking lot.

MANCHESTER, N.H. – A request for 79-E tax relief for a new downtown apartment complex was approved by the Manchester Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BMA) on Tuesday following opposition by the Manchester Heritage Commission.

The Heritage Commission found in January that 24 Depot St. and 21 West Auburn St., the two properties that would hold the new apartment building, were culturally and historically significant to the city. Under New Hampshire Revised Statute Annotated Chapter 79-E, a law designed to help renovate dilapidated parts of downtown areas through tax relief, any properties found culturally, historically, or architecturally significant are not eligible for the 79-E tax relief.

City solicitor Emily Rice told the BMA they had three options regarding the 79-E requests for the two properties: approve the requests, send the matter back to the Heritage Commission or request additional investigation on the cultural, historical and architectural significance of the property by the New Hampshire Department of Historical Resources.

Susan Manchester, an attorney for the applicant, told the BMA that under 79-E, any city can modify RSA 79-E to its own needs, and that the Heritage Commission is an advisory body to the BMA.

Manchester Board of Assessors Chairman Robert Gagne said that the two properties did meet the other requirements of RSA 79-E, providing a public benefit and being located within the downtown area or village center of a municipality.

Michael Duffy, a former member of the Heritage Commission, felt that the request for tax relief was inappropriate given the decision of the Heritage Commission on what the loss of the building would mean to the city’s cultural and historical makeup.

“To make taxpayers bear the cost of destroying our cultural heritage is insult to injury,” he said.


DSC 9631
June Trisciani on Feb. 15, 2022. Photo/Andrew Sylvia

At-Large Alderman June Trisciani, who served as chair of the Planning Board when the application was approved last fall, re-stated the need for housing in the city that this development would help alleviate as well as the complicated nature of the building due to the various uses and tenants that have occupied the building over the years.

Trisciani also noted that the applicant also agreed to incorporate historical elements of the two properties into the new development.

Eric LeClair of Jones Street, the financial backers of the proposed development, noted that the new building would include facades from the original buildings, columns that echo the design of the original buildings and brick on the first floor.

LeClair said that if the 79E request was not approved in full, the proposed development would have to “go back to the drawing board.”

The measure passed on a 9-3 vote, with opposition from Ward 5 Alderman Anthony Sapienza, Ward 6 Alderman Sebastian Sharonov and Ward 8 Alderman Ed Sapienza.

 

About this Author

Andrew Sylvia

Assistant EditorManchester Ink Link

Born and raised in the Granite State, Andrew Sylvia has written approximately 10,000 pieces over his career for outlets across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont. On top of that, he's a licensed notary and licensed to sell property, casualty and life insurance, he's been a USSF trained youth soccer and futsal referee for the past six years and he can name over 60 national flags in under 60 seconds according to that flag game app he has on his phone, which makes sense because he also has a bachelor's degree in geography (like Michael Jordan). He can also type over 100 words a minute on a good day.